• Question: In your opinion, what is the most interesting enigma of modern science, and what do you think the explanation will be?

    Asked by azrael to Daniel, Jon, Louise, Sharon, Zoe on 18 Jun 2010 in Categories: . This question was also asked by jonny17.
    • Photo: Louise Dash

      Louise Dash answered on 16 Jun 2010:


      For me, I think it would be the incompatibility between general relativity and quantum theory, and the search for a “theory of everything” that would unite them. It seems at the moment as though we’re still a long way from the solution to this, but history has shown that sometimes a solution to a long-standing problem will pop up seemingly from nowhere!

      However, even if/when we do have a theory that explains all of physics, I don’t think us physicists will be out of a job. There will be a lot to do in *applying* this theory to real-life situations, in ways that can make our lives better.

    • Photo: Sharon Sneddon

      Sharon Sneddon answered on 16 Jun 2010:


      Not sure what happened to my original answer, it seems to have been replaced by the letter J, and I don’t think that is the most interesting engima of modern science!!

      I’ll try and remember what I wrote before!
      I think that the way DNA can mutate and confuse us is the most interesting enigma, just when we think we know whats going on in our genes, and we develop new drugs for diseases like cancer, our DNA gets all clever and starts changing and we need to start all over again.

      Cancer in itself is an enigma, there is not going to be just one cure for cancer as it’s a disease in many shapes and forms and as scientists like myself are going to have to keep working to find cures for all of these, and also new treatments to stop it, when it gets clever and changes and becomes less responsive to the current treatments. Thats why being a scientist is so important, as there are always going to be new things to learn and discover

    • Photo: Jon Copley

      Jon Copley answered on 16 Jun 2010:


      Nice question… For me, probably the most interesting unanswered question in science is “how did life on Earth begin?”.

      Life on Earth has transformed our planet from a barren rock into a world that is very different to the others we have found so far. If we can understand how life began, then it will help our search for life beyond Earth – and “are we alone / is our living world unique” would be a HUGE question to answer, perhaps making a lot of people rethink their view of the world. By “are we alone”, I don’t mean intelligent extraterrestrial life (though of course that would be staggering), but even just life analagous to Earthly microbes.

      I think we’re getting closer to cracking how life on Earth began, but there are still huge challenges to figuring out something that happened probably around four billion years ago, when conditions on Earth were very different to those today. I like to think of it as a crime scene – but much of the evidence has since been washed away, eroded, obliterated, or generally tampered with now that modern life leaves its own “fingerprints” smeared everywhere.

      If I had a definitive answer, then I’d have a Nobel Prize (and there’s also a separate prize specifically for anyone who solves the origins of life, not that science is about chasing prizes). There are two approaches to the problem. One is to look at all modern living things, and by identifying the similarities between them and comparing the differences, figure out what their “universal ancestor” must have been like. But that approach has run into some big roadblocks (because the way that microbes pass on genetic material can be different to that of other organisms – genes can “jump” between different types of microbes that are not actually related).

      The other approach is to think about what you need to build life from scratch, and see how and where that could happen. There have been lots of advances in making the “building blocks” for life, in lots of different ways (but that’s still a very, very long way from actually putting together a living organism). One environment that looks promising for that are the kinds of undersea volcanic vents where I work. But they’re far from the only candidates – there are lots of other places where you can do neat “prebiotic” chemistry with the building blocks for life, such as in clouds, shallow ponds, or even dust in space.

      So it’s going to take a lot more work, I think… Maybe one of you could be the one to solve it? In the meantime, if you are interested (or bored!), here’s a link to a video of a lecture that I give to first-year university students about the origins of life. Some of the content is actually is a little out-of-date now (it was recorded a few years ago), but I think it’s still ok for an introduction to the subject. The file is pretty large (11 megabytes), so it may take a few minutes to download:

      http://www.thesearethevoyages.net/ias/origins.html

    • Photo: Zoe Duck

      Zoe Duck answered on 18 Jun 2010:


      I’m not sure, there are lots of interesting questions at the moment such as how to reduce climate change, how to generate renewable energy efficiently, how to best stop so many bacteria developing resistance to antibiotics, how to reduce aging, how to cure cancer…. the list goes on 🙂

Comments